Our clinically-relevant cost-effectiveness and budget impact models support value positioning by encouraging rich conversations among payers, clinicians, and researchers.
PHAR's expert methodologists and experienced clinicians rely on their vast experience to select the appropriate data source and design the optimal retrospective study.
Our qualitative and quantitative evidence summaries can be used in stand alone publications or serve as the basis for more complex analyses.
When existing data sources are inadequate to answer key research questions, PHAR researchers can design and conduct studies gathering real world data from electronic health records or other primary sources.